The final non-import agreements in 1774 were initiated by the Continental Congress which founded the Continental Association. The non-import agreements of the late colonial period were important precursors to the American Revolution. The agreements fueled tensions that led to violence. The negotiation of the accords brought the Boston Patriots to the forefront and demonstrated to the settlers the potential for united action. On a deeper level, the agreements helped settlers become their emerging national identity as Americans by helping them promote their cultural value of austerity on a national stage. The Boston Non-Import Agreement of August 1, 1768 was a formal collective decision of Boston-based merchants and merchants not to import or export objects to the United Kingdom. The agreement, essentially a boycott, was a series of trade restrictions agreed upon by the settlers with respect to trade with the metropolis. The agreement was made to protest and fight the Townshend Revenue Act of 1767. According to the Townshend Revenue Act, a tax was to be paid for the purchase of glass, lead, oil, paint, paper and tea. The Boston Non-Import Agreement was one of the most effective means of colonial resistance to British policy in the years leading up to the American Revolution. A similar tactic was used again five years later in Boston and throughout the colonies to protest the Tea Act with the British East India Company`s tea boycott, which culminated in the Boston Tea Party. VII.

Finally, that we do not purchase Negroes, goods or imported goods from persons residing in that province who refuse or refuse to sign this agreement within one month from the date of this agreement; Unless it seems that he was inevitably prevented from doing the same. And any subscriber who does not strictly and verbatim abides by this agreement, in accordance with the real intent and importance of this agreement, should be treated with the utmost contempt. The first non-import agreements began with the Stamp Act of 1765. First, by addressing James Otis Jr. who advised the Massachusetts House of Representatives to petition the British King. This led to the Massachusetts Circular Letter, written by Samuel Adams and James Otis Jr. which was sent to other colonies and recommended class action against the British Parliament and the Townshend Act. Such colonial initiatives sparked a debate about whether the British parliament has the right to levy taxes with the sole intention of generating revenue. The colonial argument, also imposed by Dickinson, was that they could not be taxed without elected representatives (“no taxation without representation”[3]).

Parliament`s counter-argument was the duty to protect their citizens and their subjects. These colonial attempts to deny this British policy ended with the dissolution of the New York and Massachusetts assemblies. As the British government did not understand the reason for the colonial objections, a conflict between the metropolis and the colony became inevitable. In these complaints, Parliament has clearly attempted to weaken its authority, the navigation laws, the trading system and, consequently, the entire empire. [4] The only peaceful means left for the American colonies to impose their demands on the British government were probably boycotts of British goods. These intentions formed into an initiative of Boston traders and traders that led to the Boston Agreement not importing. “Boston non-import agreement”. Boston Tea Party. Boston Tea Party Boats & Museum. Called November 18, 2018. .

. .